Tips on running a successful small business by the founder of Nolo, a publisher of self-help law books. I enjoyed reading this book, it was clear and straightforward, although sometimes the examples were a little simplistic. I plan to read more law-related titles from Nolo.
A discussion of copyright issues in the digital era. This is a very good, but depressing book. Of special interest is the way Littman describes the point of view of the other side (I’m presuming you are primarily a consumer of copyrighted works and not a ‘content company’ or a lawyer who represents same) and the reasons why the process which creates copyright legislation almost always neglects the consumer (i.e., the reader/watcher/listener/etc.). Try googling on copyright issues for more information.
A book about the philosophical implications of Darwinism. Written with humor and keen insight, this book has many good references for further reading.
I read this book with great interest because one of its topics — the effect the theory of evolution has on ideas in non-biological settings like religion and culture — has fascinated me for some time. Although many people do not find any conflict (or even relationship) between evolution and religion, I have found it difficult to see evolution as neutral on the subject of faith in an absolute deity.
Dennet argues persuasively that evolution is not neutral on the subject of religion, nor is evolution neutral towards a host of other fields. Dennett likens evolution to a ‘universal acid’ which eats through traditional ideas and beliefs and leaves them transformed, though not always destroyed. Indeed, Dennett claims that meaning itself is best understood as the product of an evolutionary process. Heady stuff!
Because of the broad scope of the book, some subjects are necessarily treated lightly. But the bibliography is extensive and will keep me busy for some time.
After reading Darwin’s Dangerous Idea, I decided to read Dennet’s other books. This book is Dennet’s Ph.D. thesis in which he sets out the problem of mind, disposes of some of the common fallacies in the philosophy of mind, and maps out some of the parameters that an analysis of the mind would have to adhere to. Although not as exciting as Darwin’s Dangerous Idea, the writing shows Dennet’s trademark clarity and I look forward to reading his subsequent efforts.